The Court as Gatekeeper: Preventing Unreliable Pretrial E-Discovery from Jeopardizing a Reliable Fact-Finding Process

This Association of Certified E-Discovery Specialists (ACEDS) piece republishes a recent Fordham Law Review article addressing the debate surrounding “whether the predicates outlined in Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and interpreted by Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. should be applied to adjudicating issues relating to technology-assisted review (TAR).” The article emphasizes the need for lawyers to understand the implications pretrial ESI review has on admissibility at trial.

Read the full article here.

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top